California Foodbank Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Fund Misuse

Categories: California Breaking NewsCalifornia News

Empty shelves at California Foodbank symbolize allegations of fund mismanagement.

News Summary

The Foodbank of Southern California is embroiled in controversy as accusations of mismanagement and misuse of over $11 million in funds emerge. The state has filed a lawsuit against the organization, its leaders, and board members, alleging improper use of donations intended for vulnerable communities. Serious allegations include falsified expense reimbursements and personal spending on home renovations and gifts. As the investigation continues, the future of this once-trusted nonprofit hangs in the balance, raising questions about accountability and community support.

California’s Foodbank of Southern California in Hot Water Over Allegations of Misusing Funds

Long Beach, California — A storm is brewing around the Foodbank of Southern California, a once-thriving nonprofit organization that has served vulnerable communities for nearly fifty years. Recent allegations have surfaced, claiming that leaders within the food bank mismanaged a staggering over $11 million in funds intended for those in need, using the money for personal gains instead of serving their communities.

What’s the Fuss About?

The state of California has officially filed a lawsuit against the Foodbank of Southern California and its top leadership. The accusations are serious, suggesting that funds from both state and federal programs were used improperly for personal expenses. The investigation kicked off on June 1, 2024, ignited by a whistleblower who brought to light various instances of financial misconduct, including falsified expense reimbursements.

Details of the Allegations

At the heart of the lawsuit, investigators found evidence indicating that the Foodbank had received funds for goods and services that simply didn’t exist. In an eyebrow-raising turn, it appears that approximately $200,000 was incorrectly allocated toward 4,000 $50 Walmart gift cards, with no proof they ever reached those who were supposed to receive them. Additionally, over $28,000 was reportedly used for gas expenses incurred by former CEO Jeanne Cooper as she traveled from Las Vegas to LA County.

The jaw-dropping details don’t end there. Other allegations suggest that former CEO Cooper and her spouse Lamarr Ramsey splurged on personal home renovations, lawn care, and even an artificial Christmas tree using funds meant for nonprofit activities. In a glaring example of misuse, it was reported that $228,000 was spent at retailers like Best Buy and Home Depot, all billed to the nonprofit’s accounts.

High-Ranking Leaders in Trouble

The lawsuit specifically names several key individuals, including Cooper, current CEO Brian Weaver, and twelve members of the board. Another board member, Dion Rambo, is accused of securing a contract for nearly $280,000 with a company that provided none of the promised services. Meanwhile, Michael Barrett allegedly channeled funds to pay for church billboard advertising, further muddying the waters of accountability.

Alice “Sweet” Harris, another board member, has been called out for allegedly sending $172,896 of Foodbank funds to her own nonprofit, Parents of Watts. It appears that some donors intended for their contributions to help others may have ended up benefitting Harris’s organization instead. In a questionable move, Harris also purportedly hired her granddaughter for a role that produced no tangible services.

Attempts to Curb the Damage

Despite the scandal unfolding, it’s worth noting that current board members like Brian Weaver and Michael Barrett have indicated they are working on resolving past issues since taking on their roles in 2023. The organization, which had long provided between 40 million to 60 million pounds of food annually to low-income neighborhoods across Los Angeles County, suddenly finds itself in a moral and financial quagmire.

The Road Ahead

The lawsuit not only seeks to recover $10.4 million in misallocated funds but leaves the door open for the total figure to increase as more evidence of financial impropriety comes to light. As the case progresses, the future of the Foodbank of Southern California hangs in the balance, and the communities it once nourished are left wondering who will be held accountable for this mismanagement.

With the investigation still ongoing, many are left to ponder how a beloved organization that existed to lend a helping hand could fall into such disarray. As further developments arise, one can only hope that justice will be served for those who have been affected.